Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

55 A.3d 1043, 618 Pa. 148, 2012 WL 4739525, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2306
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 4, 2012
DocketNo. 129 EM 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.3d 1043 (Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department, 55 A.3d 1043, 618 Pa. 148, 2012 WL 4739525, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2306 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2012, the “Application by Way of Petition for King’s- Bench Relief and Supersedeas,” [1044]*1044Application for Appointment of Counsel, and the Request for an Immediate Injunction” are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.3d 1043, 618 Pa. 148, 2012 WL 4739525, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-philadelphia-adult-probation-parole-department-pa-2012.