Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Soto v. Parkway Crest Associates

Soto v. Parkway Crest Associates

271 A.D.2d 435, 708 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3814
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 3, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 435 (Soto v. Parkway Crest Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soto v. Parkway Crest Associates, 271 A.D.2d 435, 708 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated May 17, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544; Gibbs v Diamond, 256 AD2d 266). Joy, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.
706 N.E.2d 1163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
Gibbs v. Diamond
256 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 435, 708 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-parkway-crest-associates-nyappdiv-2000.