Soto v. NYRAC, Inc.
This text of 44 A.D.3d 1029 (Soto v. NYRAC, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), dated January 27, 2006, which denied his motion for leave to renew his opposition to the defendants’ prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), which had been granted in an order of the same court dated August 5, 2005.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in [1030]*1030denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew (see CPLR 2221 [e]). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.D.3d 1029, 843 N.Y.S.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-nyrac-inc-nyappdiv-2007.