Soto v. Koysor

50 A.D.3d 503, 854 N.Y.S.2d 892

This text of 50 A.D.3d 503 (Soto v. Koysor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soto v. Koysor, 50 A.D.3d 503, 854 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered March 19, 2007, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in defendants’ favor dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs provided no explanation for terminating their medical treatment several months after the accident in which they claim to have sustained “serious injury” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 574-575 [2005]). Concur—Lippman, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pommells v. Perez
830 N.E.2d 278 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.3d 503, 854 N.Y.S.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-koysor-nyappdiv-2008.