Soto v. Estelle
This text of 123 F. App'x 157 (Soto v. Estelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district court’s order dismissing the case was conditioned upon the parties [158]*158reaching a final settlement agreement, and it gave the parties 90 days to move for reinstatement if a settlement agreement was not reached. Thus, the order was not a final, appealable order for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Otis v. City of Chicago, 29 F.3d 1159, 1167 (7th Cir.1994); see also Berke v. Bloch, 242 F.3d 131, 135 (3d Cir.2001). DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 F. App'x 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-estelle-ca5-2005.