Soto v. County of Sacramento

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 11, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-00910
StatusUnknown

This text of Soto v. County of Sacramento (Soto v. County of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soto v. County of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP 1 Van Longyear, CSB No.: 84189 Nicole M. Cahill, CSB No.: 287165 2 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, CA 95864 3 Phone: 916-974-8500 Facsimile: 916-974-8510 4 Attorneys for Defendants, 5 County of Sacramento, Deputy Blake Grinder, Deputy Kenneth Lloyd, Deputy John Higley, 6 Deputy Israel Hernandez, Deputy Jacqueline Jennings, Deputy Andrew Garside, Sgt. Kelley Bunn, 7 Sgt. Charles Gailey and Sheriff Scott Jones

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11

12 SILVIA SOTO, an individual, LATANYA ) No. 2:19-cv-00910-TLN-DB 13 ANDREWS, an individual, MARCELO M.S., ) minor, and MARLENIE M.S., a minor, by and ) JOINT STIPULATION AND 14 through their guardian ad litem, SILVIA ) PROTECTIVE ORDER SOTO, in each case both individually and as ) 15 successors-in-interest to the ESTATE OF ) MARSHALL MILES, Deceased, ) 16 ) Plaintiffs ) 17 ) v. ) 18 ) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, BLAKE ) 19 GRINDER, KENNETH LLOYD, JOHN ) HIGLEY, ISRAEL HERNANDEZ, FNU ) 20 JENNINGS, ANDREW GARSIDE, GREG ) WHITE, KELLEY BUNN, CHARLES ) 21 GAILEY, SCOTT JONES and DOES 1 ) through 100, inclusive, ) 22 ) Defendants. ) 23 ) 24 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 25 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action involve production of confidential, 26 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 27 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. The Parties have 28 determined that certain documents that may be subject to disclosure in this action contain 1 information that is (a) confidential, sensitive, or potentially invasive of an individual’s privacy 2 interests; (b) not generally known; and (c) not normally revealed to the public or third parties, or 3 if disclosed to third parties, would require such third parties to maintain the information in 4 confidence. This confidential or private information warrants special protection from public 5 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. 6 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 7 Stipulated Protective Order on the basis that the documents described herein and anticipated to 8 be subject to disclosure in this matter contain confidential and protected information that may 9 only be disclosed and/or produced subject to the following terms, unless timely challenged 10 subject to the provisions in Section 6, below. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not 11 confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 12 affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 13 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 14 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not 15 entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures 16 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 17 the court to file material under seal. 18 2. DEFINITIONS 19 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 20 information or items under this Order. 21 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Protected Material, as defined in Section 22 2.13 below and marked as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this order. 23 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record (as well as their support staff). 24 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 25 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 26 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 27 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 28 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 1 responses to discovery in this matter. 2 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 3 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 4 consultant in this action. 5 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 6 entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.9 Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are 8 retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of 9 that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 10 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 11 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staffs). 12 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 16 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 17 subcontractors. 18 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is within the scope of 19 this order as described in Section 3 below and thereafter designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 21 Producing Party. 22 3. SCOPE 23 The documents eligible for protection under this Order are: 24  Law enforcement personnel file documents and materials that concern, relate, or refer 25 to fitness for duty reports and evaluations, performance evaluations, discipline, 26 awards, commendations and recognition, reassignments or position changes, 27 employee personal data, and related records; and 28  Sheriff’s Department or CHP internal investigation documents and materials 1 including internal affairs investigation files, citizen complaints, personnel file 2 documents and data, incident reports, log books, and other related records. 3 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 4 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 5 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 6 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 7 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 8 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 9 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 10 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 11 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 12 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 13 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 14 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 15 4. DURATION 16 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 17 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 18 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 19 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 20 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 21 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 22 applicable law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Soto v. County of Sacramento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-county-of-sacramento-caed-2020.