Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Soto v. Commissioner of Correction

Soto v. Commissioner of Correction

848 A.2d 1292, 82 Conn. App. 903, 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 170
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedApril 20, 2004
DocketAC 24135
StatusPublished

This text of 848 A.2d 1292 (Soto v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soto v. Commissioner of Correction, 848 A.2d 1292, 82 Conn. App. 903, 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 170 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The habeas court denied the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his petition for certification to appeal to this court. After a careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); see also Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 432, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozada v. Deeds
498 U.S. 430 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Simms v. Warden, State Prison
646 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 A.2d 1292, 82 Conn. App. 903, 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-commissioner-of-correction-connappct-2004.