Soto v. City of New York
534 N.E.2d 316, 73 N.Y.2d 808, 537 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3457
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. CPLR 2215 does not effect an extension of the time provided in CPLR 5513 (c) when leave to appeal is sought by cross motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soto v. City of New York, 534 N.E.2d 316, 73 N.Y.2d 808, 537 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3457 (N.Y. 1988).
534 N.E.2d 316 (Soto v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
U.S.A. Electronics, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (In Re U.S.A. Electronics, Inc.)
120 B.R. 637 (E.D. New York, 1990)