Soto Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
LESLIE ANN SOTO PEREZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:22-cv-710-RBD-KCD
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER In this Social Security appeal, Plaintiff challenges the denial of her application for supplemental security income benefits. (Doc. 1.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision, granting judgment in favor of the Commissioner, and closing the file. (Doc. 24 (“R&R”).) Neither party objected, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and then to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 3, 2023.
baa He ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soto Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security (Soto Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.