Soto Guerrero v. Antojitos & Natural Juice Bar II LLC
This text of Soto Guerrero v. Antojitos & Natural Juice Bar II LLC (Soto Guerrero v. Antojitos & Natural Juice Bar II LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
BELLA YRIS SOTO GUERRERO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 24-CV-5774 (JPO) Plaintiffs, ORDER -v-
ANTOJITOS & NATURAL JUICE BAR II LLC, et al., Defendants.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court has been notified that Plaintiff Bella Yris Soto Guerrero voluntarily dismissed her actions without prejudice in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. Plaintiff is advised that, if this dispute was resolved by some form of settlement, she may not dismiss this action with or without prejudice unless the settlement agreement has been approved by either the Court or the Department of Labor. See Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc., 24 F.4th 804, 810 (2d Cir. 2022) (extending Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015) to cases of voluntary dismissal without prejudice). Any letter motion, along with the settlement agreement, must be filed on the public docket within thirty days of this order. The letter motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and should discuss, at a minimum, the following factors: (1) the plaintiff’s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which “the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses in establishing their respective claims and defenses”; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether “the settlement agreement is the product of arm’s-length bargaining between experienced counsel”; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion. Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Medley v. Am. Cancer Soc., No. 10 Civ. 3214, 2010 WL 3000028, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2010)). The letter must also address whether there is a bona fide dispute as to the number of hours worked or the amount of compensation due and how much of the proposed settlement plaintiffs attorney shall be seeking as fees. Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 203, 206. Absent special circumstances, the Court will not approve any settlement agreement that is filed under seal or in redacted form. /d. at 206. The parties are directed to file a letter or stipulation, stating whether a settlement was reached, and, if so, including the information above, on or before November 13, 2024. All other filing deadlines, conference dates, and the trial date are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 30, 2024 New York, New York
| J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Soto Guerrero v. Antojitos & Natural Juice Bar II LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-guerrero-v-antojitos-natural-juice-bar-ii-llc-nysd-2024.