Soto, Armando Fermin
This text of Soto, Armando Fermin (Soto, Armando Fermin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-82,563-01 & WR-82,563-02
EX PARTE ARMANDO FERMIN SOTO, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W10-19502-(H)A & W10-19503-H(A) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted in two causes
of intoxicated manslaughter, and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years in each cause.
The trial court signed orders designating issues on July 7, 2014. After 180 days from the day
the writ applications were served on the State, the writ applications were forwarded to this Court.
TEX . R. APP . P. 73.5.
Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to relief. We remand these applications to the 204th District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an
evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. In addition to resolving
the issue of whether Applicant received appropriate notice from the court of appeals, the trial court
shall also obtain a response from appellate counsel to resolve the issues of whether Applicant
received appropriate Anders notice from appellate counsel, and whether the notice advised him
correctly of his opportunity to file a pro se response. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In
re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408–09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: February 4, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Soto, Armando Fermin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-armando-fermin-texcrimapp-2015.