Sotirios Ampatis v. Compania Maritima Samsoc LTDA., S. A.

S.D. New York

Sotirios Ampatis v. Compania Maritima Samsoc LTDA., S. A.

103 F. Supp. 733, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3777

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 30, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Motion for reargument granted.

Motion for -an order modifying the order entered herein overruling the first three exceptions to the libel dated March 10, 1950 is granted to the extent that the libelants must plead authority to represent other claimants. Wahlborg v. American S. S. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1938, 94 F. Supp. 698; Totolos v. Companía De Navegacion Cristobal, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1950, 94 F. Supp. 699. Libelants shall serve their amended pleading within ten days. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Motion for reargument granted.

Motion for -an order modifying the order entered herein overruling the first three exceptions to the libel dated March 10, 1950 is granted to the extent that the libelants must plead authority to represent other claimants. Wahlborg v. American S. S. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1938, 94 F. Supp. 698; Totolos v. Companía De Navegacion Cristobal, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1950, 94 F. Supp. 699. Libelants shall serve their amended pleading within ten days. So ordered.

Sotirios Ampatis v. Compania Maritima Samsoc LTDA., S. A., 103 F. Supp. 733, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3777 (S.D.N.Y. 1951).

Pincite

103 F. Supp. 733 (Sotirios Ampatis v. Compania Maritima Samsoc LTDA., S. A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related