Sotelo v. State

977 S.W.2d 588, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 190248
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 22, 1998
DocketNo. 1687-96
StatusPublished

This text of 977 S.W.2d 588 (Sotelo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sotelo v. State, 977 S.W.2d 588, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 190248 (Tex. 1998).

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Our decision to grant the State’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sotelo v. State, 931 S.W.2d 745 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996), was improvident. Accordingly, the State’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

McCORMICK, P.J., and MANSFIELD, KELLER and WOMACK, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sotelo v. State
931 S.W.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
977 S.W.2d 588, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 190248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sotelo-v-state-texcrimapp-1998.