Sotelo v. State

977 S.W.2d 588, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 190248
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sotelo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 104
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 1998·No. No. 1687-96·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Our decision to grant the State’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sotelo v. State, 931 S.W.2d 745 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996), was improvident. Accordingly, the State’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

McCORMICK, P.J., and MANSFIELD, KELLER and WOMACK, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sotelo v. State, 977 S.W.2d 588, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 190248 (Tex. 1998).

977 S.W.2d 588 (Sotelo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sotelo v. State
931 S.W.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)