Sosnowski v. Monti

651 A.2d 1334, 36 Conn. App. 941, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 11
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1995
Docket13453
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 A.2d 1334 (Sosnowski v. Monti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sosnowski v. Monti, 651 A.2d 1334, 36 Conn. App. 941, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 11 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is the defendant lessee’s appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff lessor in a summary process action based on a written lease that by its terms expired on July 31,1994. “While a writ of restoration may issue upon a reversal of a summary process judgment, it can only issue if the lease has not expired by its terms.” Evergreen Manor Associates v. Farrell, 9 Conn. App. 77, 78, 515 A.2d 1081 (1986). Under the circumstances here, there is no practical relief that this court can give. It is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions disconnected from the granting of actual relief. Id.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 A.2d 1334, 36 Conn. App. 941, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sosnowski-v-monti-connappct-1995.