Sosa v. State
666 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 740, 1996 WL 34884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sosa v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 639 So. 2d 173 →
Opinion
The order below, which denied the defendant’s motion for Rule 3.850 relief on the ground that it was untimely filed more than two years after the final appellate mandate, is affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sosa v. State, 666 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 740, 1996 WL 34884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
666 So. 2d 1052 (Sosa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.