Sorto v. Stover

Fourth Circuit

Sorto v. Stover

673 F. App'x 361

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2017·No. No. 16-7141·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julio Zelaya Sorto appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sorto v. Stover, No. 5:14-ct-3130-FL, 2016 WL 4257343 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julio Zelaya Sorto appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sorto v. Stover, No. 5:14-ct-3130-FL, 2016 WL 4257343 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sorto v. Stover, 673 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

673 F. App'x 361 (Sorto v. Stover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related