Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sorrough v. Smith

Sorrough v. Smith

178 S.E.2d 922, 122 Ga. App. 849, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sorrough v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Ga. App. 882 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 18, 1970·No. 45286·Published

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

On motion for rehearing in Sorrough v. Smith, 121 Ga. App. 882 (175 SE2d 926), we thought we had properly distinguished the case of Hurst v. Starr, 226 Ga. 42 (172 SE2d 604); but on certiorari (Smith v. Sorrough, 226 Ga. 744 (177 SE2d 246)), the Supreme Court thought otherwise. Therefore, in conformity with its judgment, our judgment in Sorrough v. Smith, supra, is vacated. Based upon the controlling case of Hurst v. Starr, supra, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Hall, P. J., and Deen, J., concur. [850] Decided November 18, 1970. Scott & Alexander, Guy B. Scott, Jr., for appellant. Erwin, Epting, Gibson & Chilivis, Nickolas P. Chilivis, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrough v. Smith, 178 S.E.2d 922, 122 Ga. App. 849, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1059 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

178 S.E.2d 922 (Sorrough v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Sorrough
177 S.E.2d 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Hurst v. Starr
172 S.E.2d 604 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Sorrough v. Smith
175 S.E.2d 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)