Sorrentino v. Paganica

18 A.D.3d 858, 796 N.Y.S.2d 667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 2005·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated July 15, 2004, which denied her motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

[859]*859In opposition to the defendant’s prima facie demonstration that the sole proximate cause of the plaintiffs alleged injury was his own negligence in placing his fingers into the chute of the defendant’s snow blower, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Amaya v L’Hommedieu, 6 AD3d 638 [2004]; see also Liriano v Hobart Corp., 92 NY2d 232 [1998]; Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308 [1980]). Thus, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrentino v. Paganica, 18 A.D.3d 858, 796 N.Y.S.2d 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 858 (Sorrentino v. Paganica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. Asoli
2019 NY Slip Op 2688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Balash v. Melrod
2018 NY Slip Op 8769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Gorbatov v. Matfer Group
136 A.D.3d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
McGrath v. Oyster Bay Visiting Nurse Ass'n
84 A.D.3d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Isselbacher v. Larry Lopez Truck Equipment Manufacturing Co.
66 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Donuk v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
52 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)