Sorrentino v. O'Connell

285 A.D. 1057, 139 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6660
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority canceling a restaurant liquor license, transferred to this court pursuant to section 1296 of said Act. Petitioner also prays for an order directing respondents to renew said license for the period March 1, 1955, to February 29, 1956. The license was cancelled on findings that (1) the premises had ceased to be operated as a bona fide restaurant; (2) adequate books and records were not maintained, and (3) the licensee knowingly employed a disqualified person, a convicted felon. Determination annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondents for reconsideration and action not inconsistent herewith. We are of the opinion that above finding (1) is proper; that finding (2) is supported by some proof, and that finding (3) is improper because it is not supported by sufficient evidence. The matter is remitted to respondents to consider in the first instance whether there is a substantial basis for refusal to permit the continuance of the licensed premises. (Matter of Norton v. O’Connell, 282 App. Div. 744, appeal dismissed 306 N. Y. 843.) Nolan, P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrentino v. O'Connell, 285 A.D. 1057, 139 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 1057 (Sorrentino v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sorrentino v. Rohan
3 A.D.2d 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
O'Meally v. Rohan
286 A.D. 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)