Sorrentino v. MASELLY
This text of 844 N.E.2d 783 (Sorrentino v. MASELLY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the appeal to that Court from the order of Supreme Court dismissing the complaint, dismissed upon *766 the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Judge Read taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
844 N.E.2d 783, 6 N.Y.3d 765, 811 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorrentino-v-maselly-ny-2006.