Sorrells v. State

667 So. 2d 144, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 428, 1994 WL 529454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sorrells v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 So. 2d 142
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 30, 1994·No. CR-92-1623·Published

Opinion

On Return To Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause to the trial court it to determine the amount of restitution due for lost wages and to vacate its order setting the amount of restitution awarded as rehabilitation expenses, 667 So.2d 142. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant has been ordered to pay $204.77 in restitution for lost wages and that the portion of its prior order pertaining to rehabilitation expense has been vacated. Because the sentence imposed upon the appel[145]*145lant is now proper, the judgment of the trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrells v. State, 667 So. 2d 144, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 428, 1994 WL 529454 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

667 So. 2d 144 (Sorrells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sorrells v. State
667 So. 2d 142 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)