Sorrells v. Southern States Portland Cement Co.

105 S.E. 709, 26 Ga. App. 273, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 97
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 28, 1921·No. 11923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The plaintiff, in recommencing his suit which had been previously nonsuited, failed to comply either with section 5625 of the Civil Code (1910) as to payment of costs, or with section 5026, his affidavit in forma pauperis failing to state that “he is advised that he has good cause for recommencing his suit.” It was not error for the court to dismiss the petition on demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorrells v. Southern States Portland Cement Co., 105 S.E. 709, 26 Ga. App. 273, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 97 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

105 S.E. 709 (Sorrells v. Southern States Portland Cement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
158 S.E. 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)