Sorrell v. Navajo Nation

Navajo Nation Ct. App.

Sorrell v. Navajo Nation

3 Navajo Rptr. 23

Navajo Nation Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1980·No. No. A-CR-06-80·Published

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OPPOSING APPEAL AND DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

The Acting Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation, pursuant to Title 7, Section 801, of the Navajo Tribal Code, having reviewed the pleadings filed in the above captioned matter, makes the following findings:

1. That this appeal is not timely filed because the judgment being appealed is dated February 05, 1980, and the notice of appeal was filed on April 07, 1980, which is more than the 30 days allowed within which to take an appeal pursuant to Title 7 N.T.C. §801; and

2. That there has been no motion for reconsideration filed with the District Court pursuant to Rule 5(d) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal in the above entitled action be DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OPPOSING APPEAL AND DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

The Acting Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation, pursuant to Title 7, Section 801, of the Navajo Tribal Code, having reviewed the pleadings filed in the above captioned matter, makes the following findings:

1. That this appeal is not timely filed because the judgment being appealed is dated February 05, 1980, and the notice of appeal was filed on April 07, 1980, which is more than the 30 days allowed within which to take an appeal pursuant to Title 7 N.T.C. §801; and

2. That there has been no motion for reconsideration filed with the District Court pursuant to Rule 5(d) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal in the above entitled action be DISMISSED.

Sorrell v. Navajo Nation, 3 Navajo Rptr. 23 (navajoctapp 1980).

Pincite

3 Navajo Rptr. 23 (Sorrell v. Navajo Nation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.