Sorquist v. Ward

First Circuit

Sorquist v. Ward

83 F.2d 890, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2673

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 23, 1936

DocketNo. 3105

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 F.2d 890 (Sorquist v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sorquist v. Ward, 83 F.2d 890, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2673 (1st Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents no doubtful point of law. The hearing before the Immigration Inspector was conducted with scrupulous fairness and the accused was represented by counsel. The Inspector’s decision, adverse to the alien, was carefully and fairly considered by the Board of Review and was affirmed. It can by no means be said to be unsupported by any substantial evidence.

The decree appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Peters in the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents no doubtful point of law. The hearing before the Immigration Inspector was conducted with scrupulous fairness and the accused was represented by counsel. The Inspector’s decision, adverse to the alien, was carefully and fairly considered by the Board of Review and was affirmed. It can by no means be said to be unsupported by any substantial evidence.

The decree appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Peters in the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 F.2d 890, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorquist-v-ward-ca1-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack