Sorokina v. Moody

91 A.D.3d 1307, 937 N.Y.2d 650
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order denying her amended petition seeking modification of prior orders of custody and visitation, as well as her petition alleging that the father violated those orders. Contrary to the contention of the mother, we conclude that the record supports the determination of Family Court that the mother “failed to make the requisite evidentiary showing of a change of circumstances warranting a reexamination of the existing custody arrangement” (Matter of Jackson v Beach, 78 AD3d 1549, 1550 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). With respect to the violation petition, we further conclude that the record is insufficient to establish that the father wilfully violated a clear mandate of the prior orders (see Matter of Maurice H. v Charity C., 49 AD3d 1248, 1249 [2008]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Seoniers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorokina v. Moody, 91 A.D.3d 1307, 937 N.Y.2d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

91 A.D.3d 1307 (Sorokina v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ROSSBOROUGH, RONALD D. v. ALATAWNEH, HALA Y.
129 A.D.3d 1537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)