Sorkowitz v. Lakritz, Wissbrun & Associates, Pc
This text of 708 N.W.2d 442 (Sorkowitz v. Lakritz, Wissbrun & Associates, Pc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Betty SORKOWITZ, Individually and as Trustee for the Morris & Sarah Friedman Irrevocable Trust, Betty Sorkowitz, Trustee for the Sarah Friedman Trust, Betty Sorkowitz, Personal Representative for the Estate of Sarah Friedman, Betmar Charitable Foundation, Inc., Julie Shiffman, Janet Jacobs, Carolyn Jacobs, Renee Jacobs, Jodie Shiffman and Jeffrey Shiffman, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LAKRITZ, WISSBRUN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., a/k/a Lakritz, Wissburn & Associates, P.C., Gerald Lakrtiz and Kenneth Wissburn, a/k/a Kenneth Wissburn, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of the order of November 28, 2005 is considered and it is DENIED because it does not appear the order was entered erroneously.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and reinstate the decision of the Court of Appeals for reasons stated in her dissent.
MARKMAN, J., would grant reconsideration and reinstate the Court of Appeals decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 N.W.2d 442, 474 Mich. 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorkowitz-v-lakritz-wissbrun-associates-pc-mich-2006.