Sorichetti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sorichetti v. City of New York

102 A.D.2d 709, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 709 (Sorichetti v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sorichetti v. City of New York, 102 A.D.2d 709, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anthony J. Mercorella, J.), entered June 29,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to plaintiff Dina A. Sorichetti, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of plaintiff Dina A. Sorichetti to $2,000,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. H After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Silverman and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anthony J. Mercorella, J.), entered June 29,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to plaintiff Dina A. Sorichetti, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of plaintiff Dina A. Sorichetti to $2,000,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. H After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Silverman and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 709, 476 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorichetti-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1984.