Sorice v. Captree Homes, Ltd.

250 A.D.2d 755, 672 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 1998·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 2, 1997, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against each defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the injured plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in the sport of rollerblading, as well as those arising from the open and obvious condition of the road on which he was traveling (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432; Steward v Town of Clarkstown, 224 AD2d 405; Kensy v Village of Southampton, 206 AD2d 506). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorice v. Captree Homes, Ltd., 250 A.D.2d 755, 672 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 755 (Sorice v. Captree Homes, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CUSTODI, ROBIN v. TOWN OF AMHERST
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Custodi v. Town of Amherst
81 A.D.3d 1344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Utkin v. Rademacher
261 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Mor v. Yeshiva Yesode Hatorah Nachlals Yakov
256 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)