Soriano v. Rexach

21 P.R. 411
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedNovember 6, 1914
DocketNo, 1221
StatusPublished

This text of 21 P.R. 411 (Soriano v. Rexach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Soriano v. Rexach, 21 P.R. 411 (prsupreme 1914).

Opinion

Me. Justice Aldeey

delivered the opinion of the court.

From the transcript' of the record in this appeal it appears that on the day before the expiration of the time prescribed by law for submitting drafts of a statement of the case and bill of exceptions to the judge of the trial court, the appellant filed in the office of the secretary of the court a motion for an extension of time of twenty days counting from the date of the motion, which extension was granted by the court seven days later.

Later, the respondents moved the court to refuse to approve the statement of the case which had been presented within the period of extension on the ground that the said extension of time was void because it had been granted after the legal period had expired. The lower court overruled the motion and the respondents now ask this court to strike out the statement of the case and bill of exceptions which were approved by the lower court and are included in the transcript of the record brought up to this court for the purposes of the appeal,, on the said ground of the invalidity of the extension of time.

We have already said in the case of González v. Acha et al. 19 P. R. R., 1143, that extensions of time should be asked for before the expiration of the period whose extension is sought. The appellants complied with this requirement in the present case, and the fact that the court granted the extension after the expiration of the period in nowise affects the appellants. The presentation of such motion to [413]*413the judge or the secretary of' the court at the proper time was sufficient to enable the judge to exercise his discretional power.

The motion should be overruled.

Motion overruled.

Chief Justice Hernández and Justices del Toro and Hutchison concurred. Mr. Justice Wolf took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P.R. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soriano-v-rexach-prsupreme-1914.