Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket, Ltd.

304 A.D.2d 415, 757 N.Y.S.2d 438, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4188
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about January 2, 2001, which granted defendants-respondents’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiffs allege that the complained-of accident was attributable to a negligently designed parking lot, defendant Taylor’s Supermarket, in support of its summary judgment motion, demonstrated that the parking lot in question was, at the time of the accident, in compliance with all applicable statutes, rules and regulations, and with the standards promulgated by the American Society for Testing and Materials for concrete barriers, and the conclusory responding affidavit of plaintiff’s expert was insufficient to raise a triable issue as to negligence (see Detko v McDonald’s Rests., 198 AD2d 208 [1993]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket, Ltd., 304 A.D.2d 415, 757 N.Y.S.2d 438, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 415 (Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ragusa v. Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc.
39 A.D.3d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)