Sorenson v. Sheriff
This text of 514 P.2d 868 (Sorenson v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Charged with assault with a deadly weapon, a gross misdemeanor under NRS 200.471, appellants contend the trial court erred in failing to grant them habeas relief. The sole issue is whether the evidence adduced before the magistrate was sufficient to establish probable cause to hold appellants for trial. The designation of record for appeal did not request the transcript of the preliminary examination and that transcript has not been submitted to us; therefore, we are “wholly unable to decide the issue presented.” Lamoureux v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 44, 449 P.2d 471 (1969). The order of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 P.2d 868, 89 Nev. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorenson-v-sheriff-nev-1973.