Sorenson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
This text of 204 A.D. 897 (Sorenson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for separate trial of issues affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The papers present no reason for interfering with the order made by the justice at Special Term in the exercise of his discretion. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 443.) The reasons for separate trial asserted by defendant are not the reasons stated by this court in Warner v. Star Co. (162 App. Div. 458); Piuntkosky v. Harrington’s Sons Co. (167 id. 117); Arbutina v. Pittsburg Contracting Co. (168 id. 280), and Linker v. Jamison (173 id. 349). Rich, Kelly, Jayeox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorenson-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1922.