Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance

240 A.D. 1012

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.

Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance, 240 A.D. 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 1012 (Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.