Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance

240 A.D. 1012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 1012 (Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sorblum v. Travelers Insurance, 240 A.D. 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the admission of the indorsement upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 8 was error, we are of the opinion that in view of the other evidence it was not prejudicial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for affirmance, being of the opinion that the entry in the government records was admissible in evidence under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorblum-v-travelers-insurance-nyappdiv-1933.