Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality

671 F. App'x 71
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2016·No. No. 16-7186·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Sorbello appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sorbello’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sorbello has waived appellate review of the court’s order, See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Sorbello’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[72] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality, 671 F. App'x 71 (4th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 71 (Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)