Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality

671 F. App'x 71
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-7186
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 71 (Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality, 671 F. App'x 71 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Sorbello appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sorbello’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sorbello has waived appellate review of the court’s order, See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Sorbello’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[72]*72fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorbello-v-haywood-county-municipality-ca4-2016.