Sorakrai v. State

566 So. 2d 71, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6577, 1990 WL 126217
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 1990
DocketNo. 89-03548
StatusPublished

This text of 566 So. 2d 71 (Sorakrai v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sorakrai v. State, 566 So. 2d 71, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6577, 1990 WL 126217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears that this appeal has been taken directly from the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Accordingly, the appeal is subject to dismissal as premature. We note that the trial court, in accepting appellant’s plea of nolo contendere, agreed to certify that this case involves a question of great importance. However, we believe that substantially the same question already has been addressed by this court in a prior proceeding. State v. Sorakrai, 543 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Appeal dismissed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sorakrai
543 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 So. 2d 71, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6577, 1990 WL 126217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sorakrai-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.