Sorakrai v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sorakrai v. State

566 So. 2d 71, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6577, 1990 WL 126217

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1990·No. No. 89-03548·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears that this appeal has been taken directly from the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Accordingly, the appeal is subject to dismissal as premature. We note that the trial court, in accepting appellant’s plea of nolo contendere, agreed to certify that this case involves a question of great importance. However, we believe that substantially the same question already has been addressed by this court in a prior proceeding. State v. Sorakrai, 543 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Appeal dismissed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears that this appeal has been taken directly from the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Accordingly, the appeal is subject to dismissal as premature. We note that the trial court, in accepting appellant’s plea of nolo contendere, agreed to certify that this case involves a question of great importance. However, we believe that substantially the same question already has been addressed by this court in a prior proceeding. State v. Sorakrai, 543 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Appeal dismissed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Sorakrai v. State, 566 So. 2d 71, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6577, 1990 WL 126217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

566 So. 2d 71 (Sorakrai v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related