Sophus, Clyde Eugene

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 2007
DocketWR-38,283-09
StatusPublished

This text of Sophus, Clyde Eugene (Sophus, Clyde Eugene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sophus, Clyde Eugene, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-38,283-09
EX PARTE CLYDE EUGENE SOPHUS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 8555-W6 IN THE 278
TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM MADISON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a weapon in a penal institution and was sentenced to four years' imprisonment, to be served consecutively with a thirty-year conviction from a prior conviction.

In his present application, Applicant raises two grounds for review challenging his conviction, and a claim that he is being improper denied good time credits. This Court's records reflect that Applicant has filed prior applications challenging this conviction, which have been denied by this Court or dismissed as subsequent applications. We hold that Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and abuse of discretion are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are dismissed. With respect to Applicant's claim that he is being improperly denied good time credits, this Court has previously refused to consider matters such as loss of good time credit, disciplinary proceedings and inmate classification by way of a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Palomo, 759 S.W.2d 671, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988), citing Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). Therefore, this ground for review is denied.



Filed: September 12, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Brager
704 S.W.2d 46 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Ex Parte Palomo
759 S.W.2d 671 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sophus, Clyde Eugene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sophus-clyde-eugene-texcrimapp-2007.