Soogrim v. Upgrade Contracting Corp.
This text of 8 A.D.3d 57 (Soogrim v. Upgrade Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about July 17, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied summary judgment dismissing the complaint with respect to plaintiff Belfield, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The evaluation by the responding plaintiffs treating physician was based on such objective medical evidence as MRIs, x-rays and EMG results {see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]), and offered the opinion that the injuries were both related to the accident and permanent. This raises issues of fact as to whether this plaintiff sustained a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 57, 777 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soogrim-v-upgrade-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-2004.