Soo Hoo Song v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Soo Hoo Song v. United States

236 F. 1022, 149 C.C.A. 671, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2376

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 3, 1916

DocketNo. 2806

StatusPublished

This text of 236 F. 1022 (Soo Hoo Song v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soo Hoo Song v. United States, 236 F. 1022, 149 C.C.A. 671, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2376 (9th Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case having been reached for argument, counsel for the defendant in error moved the dismissal of the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, vi, 144 C. C. A. v, vi), which motion was duly submitted to the court for consideration and decision. And it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been printed as required by said rule 23, and it further appearing to the court that' the counsel for the plaintiff in error has failed to file with the clerk of this court a printed brief at least 15 days before the case was called for argument, as required by said rule 24, and that, according to this rule, the plaintiff in error is in default, and that, as prescribed by section 5 thereof, the case may be dismissed on motion, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the said motion be and hereby is granted, and that the writ of error in this case be and hereby is dismissed, for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case having been reached for argument, counsel for the defendant in error moved the dismissal of the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, vi, 144 C. C. A. v, vi), which motion was duly submitted to the court for consideration and decision. And it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been printed as required by said rule 23, and it further appearing to the court that' the counsel for the plaintiff in error has failed to file with the clerk of this court a printed brief at least 15 days before the case was called for argument, as required by said rule 24, and that, according to this rule, the plaintiff in error is in default, and that, as prescribed by section 5 thereof, the case may be dismissed on motion, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the said motion be and hereby is granted, and that the writ of error in this case be and hereby is dismissed, for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 F. 1022, 149 C.C.A. 671, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soo-hoo-song-v-united-states-ca9-1916.