Sony Corporation v. Iancu
This text of Sony Corporation v. Iancu (Sony Corporation v. Iancu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SONY CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2018-1173 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 00835. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN, Ropes & Gray LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER; HENRY HUANG, East Palo Alto, CA.
LORE A. UNT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sony Corporation v. Iancu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sony-corporation-v-iancu-cafc-2019.