Sonson v. Flagler Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

564 So. 2d 651, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6098, 1990 WL 116338
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 1990·No. No. 90-1608·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and appendices, oral argument is dispensed with, Fla.R.App.P. 9.320, and the orders under review are affirmed. Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986); Knott v. Knott, 395 So.2d 1196, 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 411 So.2d 383 (Fla.1981); Smith v. First Nat’l Bank of Pompano Beach, 336 So.2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Done Inves. v. Forman, 369 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 374 So.2d 99 (Fla.1979). Treating the appellate papers, as requested, as, in part, an application for prohibition, prohibition is denied. Fischer, 497 So.2d at 240.

No motion for rehearing will be permitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sonson v. Flagler Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 564 So. 2d 651, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6098, 1990 WL 116338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 651 (Sonson v. Flagler Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fischer v. Knuck
497 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Knott v. Knott
395 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Smith v. First National Bank of Pompano Beach
336 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Done Investments, N. V. v. Forman
369 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)