Sonotone Corporation v. Kathleen R. Reiter, Etc.

Eighth Circuit

Sonotone Corporation v. Kathleen R. Reiter, Etc.

602 F.2d 179, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13051

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 19, 1979

Docket77-1474

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 602 F.2d 179 (Sonotone Corporation v. Kathleen R. Reiter, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sonotone Corporation v. Kathleen R. Reiter, Etc., 602 F.2d 179, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13051 (8th Cir. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

*180 ORDER

This cause having been heard on writ of certiorari from the Court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and judgment having issued thereon on June 11,1979, and an opinion having issued thereon by the Supreme Court of the United States, Kathleen R. Reiter, Petitioner, v. Sonotone Corporation, et al., - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2326, 60 L.Ed.2d 931, in accordance with that opinion and judgment,

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion of this Court, filed June 19, 1978, is vacated; that the order of the district court denying motions for dismissal or, alternatively, for summary judgment, stands affirmed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with said opinion of the Supreme Court. Appellee shall have costs in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*180 ORDER

This cause having been heard on writ of certiorari from the Court to the Supreme Court of the United States, and judgment having issued thereon on June 11,1979, and an opinion having issued thereon by the Supreme Court of the United States, Kathleen R. Reiter, Petitioner, v. Sonotone Corporation, et al., - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2326, 60 L.Ed.2d 931, in accordance with that opinion and judgment,

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion of this Court, filed June 19, 1978, is vacated; that the order of the district court denying motions for dismissal or, alternatively, for summary judgment, stands affirmed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with said opinion of the Supreme Court. Appellee shall have costs in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 F.2d 179, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonotone-corporation-v-kathleen-r-reiter-etc-ca8-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack