Sonny's Italian Restaurant & Pizzeria, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

414 So. 2d 1156, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20263
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1517
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 414 So. 2d 1156 (Sonny's Italian Restaurant & Pizzeria, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sonny's Italian Restaurant & Pizzeria, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 414 So. 2d 1156, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final agency order under review revoking appellant’s liquor license is affirmed upon a holding that: (1) the agency head correctly denied the motion for disqualification, Lash, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, 411 So.2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), (2) the order is supported by substantial, competent evidence, (3) the agency properly rejected proposed facts found to be subordinate, cumulative or unnecessary with the statement that such facts were immaterial or irrelevant, Fla.Admin.Code Rule 28-5.405(3); Forress-ter v. Career Service Commission, 361 So.2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1979); accord, Agrico Chemical Co. v. State, Department of Environmental Regulation, 365 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied sub nom. Askew v. Agrico Chemical Co., 376 So.2d 74 (Fla.1979), and the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the fairness or correctness of the proceedings were materially impaired by the agency’s failure to explicitly rule on each proposed finding of fact, see Parekh v. Career Service Commission, 346 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Sec. 120.68(8), Fla. Stat. (1981), and (4) any error resulting from entry of the final order on July 2, 1981, prior to receipt of appellant’s exceptions to the recommended order, is not material in light of the fact that the exceptions, dated July 6, 1981, were not filed within the requisite ten day period of section 120.57(l)(b)8, Fla.Stat. (1981), when measured from either the date the recommended order was entered (June 19), or the date submitted to the agency and parties (June 23). Sec. 120.68(8), Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humana, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
492 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Humana v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.
492 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Bean v. CNA Insurance
15 Fla. Supp. 2d 142 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1985)
Department of Education v. Gardener
7 Fla. Supp. 2d 165 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1984)
1431 Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco
426 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 So. 2d 1156, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonnys-italian-restaurant-pizzeria-inc-v-state-department-of-fladistctapp-1982.