Sonny Wilson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
This text of Sonny Wilson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Sonny Wilson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00031-CV
SONNY WILSON, Appellant v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Appellee
From the County Court at Law Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 10044CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Sonny Wilson, an inmate, sued the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in the
County Court at Law in Walker County. The court dismissed Wilson’s petition on
April 27, 2010. Wilson’s notice of appeal was filed on January 19, 2011. By letter dated
February 8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Wilson that the appeal was subject to
dismissal because it appeared that the notice of appeal was untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P.
26.1. The Clerk also warned Wilson that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within
21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We received a response from Wilson; however, it does not provide grounds
for continuing the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); §
51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp. 2010). Wilson did not pay the filing fees
when presenting documents for filing. Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule
and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates
or reduces the fees owed by Sonny Wilson.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 16, 2011 Do not publish [CV06]
Wilson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sonny Wilson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonny-wilson-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justic-texapp-2011.