Sonnie Wellington Hereford, Iv, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Huntsville Board of Education
This text of 448 F.2d 784 (Sonnie Wellington Hereford, Iv, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Huntsville Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
448 F.2d 784
Sonnie Wellington HEREFORD, IV, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of America,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
HUNTSVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-2641.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1971.
Peter A. Hall, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Drew S. Days, III, James M. Nabrit, III, Norman J. Chachkin, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joe L. Payne, Ford, Caldwell, Ford & Payne, Dieter J. Schrader, Macon Weaver, Jack Giles, Jeff D. Smith, M. U. Griffin, II, Huntsville, Ala., for defendants-appellees.
Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Theodore J. Garrish, Civil Rights Div., U. S. Dept. of J., Washington, D. C., The Office of Education, Dept. of H. E. & W., Atlanta, Ga., A. Lattimore Gaston, Asst. U. S. Atty., David L. Norman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Brian K. Landsberg, Thomas M. Keeling, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for other interested parties.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We find no error in the judgment of the district court which forms the subject matter of this appeal. It follows that the judgment should be and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonnie-wellington-hereford-iv-united-states-of-ame-ca5-1971.