Sonnie Wellington Hereford, Iv, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Huntsville Board of Education

448 F.2d 784
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 8, 1971·No. 71-2641_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

448 F.2d 784

Sonnie Wellington HEREFORD, IV, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of America,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
HUNTSVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-2641.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1971.

Peter A. Hall, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Drew S. Days, III, James M. Nabrit, III, Norman J. Chachkin, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joe L. Payne, Ford, Caldwell, Ford & Payne, Dieter J. Schrader, Macon Weaver, Jack Giles, Jeff D. Smith, M. U. Griffin, II, Huntsville, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Theodore J. Garrish, Civil Rights Div., U. S. Dept. of J., Washington, D. C., The Office of Education, Dept. of H. E. & W., Atlanta, Ga., A. Lattimore Gaston, Asst. U. S. Atty., David L. Norman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Brian K. Landsberg, Thomas M. Keeling, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for other interested parties.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We find no error in the judgment of the district court which forms the subject matter of this appeal. It follows that the judgment should be and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sonnie Wellington Hereford, Iv, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Huntsville Board of Education, 448 F.2d 784 (5th Cir. 1971).

448 F.2d 784 (Sonnie Wellington Hereford, Iv, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Huntsville Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related