Sonnenklar v. Givens
This text of 382 So. 2d 49 (Sonnenklar v. Givens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge’s findings and judgment are supported by substantial competent evidence. Under these circumstances the ap[50]*50pellate court must affirm. Jovanovich v. Aero-Tech, Inc., 277 So.2d 555 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Apeco Marina, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, 301 So.2d 136 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Metropolitan Dade County v. Bleaufontaine, 332 So.2d 143 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). See also Famco Electric, Inc. v. Hernandez, 293 So.2d 755 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
382 So. 2d 49, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonnenklar-v-givens-fladistctapp-1979.