Sonn v. Erie Railroad

51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 114
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 3, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 51 A. 1109 (Sonn v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sonn v. Erie Railroad, 51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 114 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Collins. 37 Vroom 428.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sonn v. Erie Railroad
49 A. 458 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonn-v-erie-railroad-nj-1902.