Sonido v. District Court of the First Circuit
This text of Sonido v. District Court of the First Circuit (Sonido v. District Court of the First Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 22-APR-2026 08:19 AM Dkt. 17 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
SHELDON KALANI SONIDO, Petitioner,
vs.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Court,
and
HAWAII STATE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Drewyer, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the petition for writs of
prohibition, mandamus, and certiorari, filed August 21, 2025,
and the record, the district court had jurisdiction to determine
whether it had jurisdiction over Petitioner’s counterclaim. See
Schwartz v. State, 136 Hawaiʻi 258, 263, 361 P.3d 1161, 1166
(2015). If the district court concludes it lacks jurisdiction over the counterclaim, as it did in 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX, the
district court may issue a decision stating as much. See In re
Kanahele, 152 Hawaiʻi 501, 514, 526 P.3d 478, 491 (2023). If
Petitioner disagreed with the district court’s dismissal of the
counterclaim, Petitioner could have sought review of the
dismissal on appeal from the district court’s judgment. See
Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 641-1(a) (2016).
Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable
right to relief, nor a lack of alternatives to obtain the relief
sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi
307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition for writs of mandamus and
prohibition are denied.
It is also ordered that the petition for a writ of
certiorari is dismissed without prejudice. See Hawaiʻi Rules of
Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(a)(1) (requiring an application
for a writ of certiorari “be filed within 30 days after the
filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal
or dismissal order”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 22, 2026.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Michelle L. Drewyer
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sonido v. District Court of the First Circuit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonido-v-district-court-of-the-first-circuit-haw-2026.