Sonia Rodriguez, D/B/A Sonia's Bail Bonds v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 2002
Docket13-01-00873-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sonia Rodriguez, D/B/A Sonia's Bail Bonds v. State (Sonia Rodriguez, D/B/A Sonia's Bail Bonds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sonia Rodriguez, D/B/A Sonia's Bail Bonds v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-01-873-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

SONIA RODRIGUEZ D/B/A SONIA=S BAIL BONDS,                    Appellant,

                                                   v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 138th District Court

                                 of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, SONIA RODRIGUEZ D/B/A SONIA=S BAIL BONDS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-01-77-B.  Judgment in this cause was signed on August 20, 2001.  A timely motion for new trial was filed on September 6, 2001.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on November 19, 2001, but was not filed until December 18, 2001. 

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23rd day of May, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sonia Rodriguez, D/B/A Sonia's Bail Bonds v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonia-rodriguez-dba-sonias-bail-bonds-v-state-texapp-2002.