Songster v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

644 F. App'x 158
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2016
Docket12-3941
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 644 F. App'x 158 (Songster v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Songster v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 644 F. App'x 158 (3d Cir. 2016).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

MICHAEL A. CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on March 8, 2016.

While on appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). Appellee now seeks remand and represents to the Court that Appellants are in agreement that remand is appropriate. We hold that the District Court should have the opportunity to consider the implications of Montgomery in the first instance. For that reason, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the District Court’s order dated September 6, 2012 is VACATED and REMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent with Montgomery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Songster v. Beard
201 F. Supp. 3d 639 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 F. App'x 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/songster-v-secretary-pennsylvania-department-of-corrections-ca3-2016.