Songer v. Walker
This text of 1 Blackf. 251 (Songer v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs in the Court below might have had this judgment amended there, on motion, even after a transcript of the record had been transmitted to this Court, They could then have alleged a diminution, had a transcript of the amended record brought up by a writ of certiorari, and have thus prevented a reversal of- the judgment. Short v. Coffin, 5 Burr. 2730. And the mistake, being in the form of the judgment, might have been amended at a term subsequent to that in which tho judgment was rendered. Per Heath, J. in Burroughs v. Stevens, 5 Taunt. 554. Vide also Usher v. Dansey, 4 Maule Selw. 94. — Richardson v. Mellish, 3 Bing. 334. — Lambert v. Blackman, ante., p. 69, and note 2. — Fite v. Doe, ante, p. 127, 132.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Blackf. 251, 1823 Ind. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/songer-v-walker-ind-1823.